False dawn for hospital safety
Published by Croakey, Wednesday 27 June
A new era starts for hospital safety in Australia on 1 July – or at least that is what the official rhetoric would have us believe. On that day, new financial incentives commence which will target an official list of “hospital-acquired complications”.
But that day is a false dawn. Because of the mysterious processes of interstate fiscal equalisation undertaken by the Grants Commission, the penalties do not work that way at all.
Rather, the penalties simply affect the total funding for public hospitals from the Commonwealth to the states collectively. That is, a higher incidence of these complications in any one state affects the funding to all the states – not really an incentive at all.
In any event, the evidence suggests that these sorts of financial incentives don’t work in hospitals. It is unlikely that on 1 July doctors and nurses around Australia will go to work aiming to make fewer mistakes or misjudgements. They already are motivated professionally to do well.
Further, as shown in the Grattan Institute report All complications should count, the proposed financial incentives are targeted at a very narrow range of all possible complications and even these are not counted in some patients – patients admitted for mental illnesses, for example, are excluded from the complications count.
Interestingly, public hospitals already have strong financial incentives to improve the quality of their care. Because of the way state funding to public hospitals works, if a patient has a complication this may affect the state payment to the hospital.
Complications which the patient suffers while in hospital are counted the same way as comorbidities present when the patient was admitted to hospital. And hospitals get a higher payment for treating more complex cases – whatever the cause.
On the other hand, these complications cost hospitals money to treat. New Grattan Institute research shows (see figure) that for Australia’s 20 largest public hospitals, the additional costs of treating complications are on average more than twice as much as the additional revenue gained from treating those complications.
So avoiding complications already improves a public hospital’s bottom line.
Unfortunately, few hospitals have the capacity to do that analysis themselves, and so most hospitals would not be aware how much improving hospital safety benefits both patients and the hospital’s financial position.
States should provide more information, including about financial impacts, to hospitals, so that clinicians have the information they need to address hospital safety issues for the benefit of future patients.
Providing financial information to hospitals about the costs of complications will allow clinicians and managers to work together to develop ‘business cases’ for quality.
That will benefit patients a lot more than the false dawn of 1 July.