Graduate Winners: Assessing the public and private benefits of higher education

by Andrew Norton

Watch the report launch or listen to the podcast

By the middle of this decade, higher education tuition subsidies will cost taxpayers around $7 billion. Yet it is not clear why the public rather than students should pay.

Since most graduates do well out of higher education, enjoying good jobs and high social status, most subsidies are for courses that students would take anyway. Tuition subsidies therefore merely redistribute income to students and graduates, at the expense of the general public – particularly those who do not go to university.

Graduate Winners proposes a new model for setting the government’s contribution to the cost of higher education. Government should only subsidise tuition in the rare circumstances that this leads to public benefits that would not otherwise be created.

In virtually every degree, students perceive – and they are generally right – that they will be winners. Public money could be better spent than in subsidizing them.

Download Report

Download Media Release

Download the detailed financial analysis

Download the analysis of non-financial benefits

Download the op-ed from The Conversation

Download the additional modelling on mature age students

Download the op-ed from The Australian

Related Articles


04 December 2016

Shared interest: a universal loan fee for HELP

A 15 per cent loan fee on all new tertiary education lending could save the Commonwealth $700 million a year and make the Higher Education Loan Program more affordable for government. The fee would he…