Powering through: how to restore confidence in the National Electricity Market

by Tony Wood and David Blowers

Urgent action is needed to reduce the risk of power blackouts and restrictions across eastern Australia this summer. The state-wide blackout in South Australia last September and a series of smaller outages and incidents over the past 18 months exposed weaknesses in the system and underscored the need for targeted reform.

Action must be taken. But there is an acute danger of politicians panicking and rushing to decisions that push electricity prices higher and make it harder to reduce Australia’s emissions.

Market reforms are needed, rather than government investments in generation. New market rules would help to ensure reliable supply when something in the system breaks. And regulators should use their existing powers to recall to service some mothballed generators to ensure reserves are on hand in an emergency, even if that increases costs a little in the short run.

Greater effort is needed to ensure efficient responses to shortages in generation. Power generators should be rewarded for being flexible and responding quickly. And more customers should be offered a financial incentive to relieve stress on the system by limiting the amount of electricity they use during peak times.

In the longer-term, new generation will be needed and the best way to rebuild investor confidence in the National Electricity Market (NEM) is for Australia to finally agree on a serious and sustainable emissions reduction policy.

A decade of toxic political debates, mixed messages and policy backflips has prevented the emergence of credible climate change policy. Investment in electricity generation, including renewables, is stalling as market participants await clear policy signals from government.

Knee-jerk policy responses to the electricity market crisis, such as the Federal Government’s “Snowy Hydro 2.0” scheme and the South Australian Government’s “go-it-alone” power plan, risk destroying the NEM’s capacity to drive the new investment Australia needs for low-cost, reliable and low-emissions electricity.

If that happens, the NEM will be judged to have failed. But in fact, policy decisions will have systematically, if unintentionally, destroyed it.

The survival of the NEM cannot be assumed. But we should not give up on the market. If governments take matters fully into their own hands, the results are likely to be painful: customers will pay more for their electricity, supply could become even less reliable, and Australia still may not reduce emissions as we have promised.

Listen to a podcast with Kate Griffiths discussing the report

Read the media release

Download Report

Read the op-ed published at The Conversation

Read the op-ed published by the Australian Financial Review

Related Articles


21 June 2017

A look at Nuclear energy

A conversation with Energy Program Director Tony Wood and special guest - Director of Energy at the Breakthrough Institute, Jessica Lovering. Jessica has co-authored a number of reports and publicatio…


13 March 2017

Price shock: Is the retail electricity market failing consumers?

Competition in electricity retailing has failed to deliver lower prices for consumers, and governments will need to step in and re-regulate prices if the industry does not lift its game. Prices in…


26 June 2017

Steering post-Finkel energy policy through a minefield of friends and foes

Published by the Australian Financial Review, Monday 26 June Delivering secure and affordable electricity will make or break Malcolm Turnbull and his government. To pull this off, he will need a cr…